Bcard

Re-Positioning

Price elasticity is what we call the extent to which people react to changes in price. Sometimes changing the prices could lead to a higher economic, but also societal impact (more people using the product/service). Pricing however is a crucial marketing variable that also informs potential users about the quality of the value proposition.

VET: How does circularity affect the price of your product/service?

HEI: How do you work with governments, society, academia and companies to re-position a circular sustainable product/service that has a higher price?


(Re)Positioning in the fashion domain refers to the strategic process of changing or adjusting the perception, image, or market positioning of a fashion brand, product, or service within the competitive landscape. It involves redefining the target audience, value proposition, brand identity, and marketing strategies to establish a unique and differentiated position in the market.

Assessing the competitive landscape

(Re)positioning begins with a thorough analysis of the competitive landscape in the fashion industry. Fashion brands need to understand their competitors, their target market segments, and the positioning strategies they have adopted. This analysis helps identify gaps, opportunities, and areas where the brand can differentiate itself to gain a competitive edge.

Identifying target audience

(Re)positioning involves identifying or redefining the target audience for the fashion brand. This could involve narrowing down the target market segment or expanding to new customer segments. Understanding the target audience’s demographics, preferences, values, and behaviors is crucial for crafting a tailored value proposition and marketing messages that resonate with the intended users.

Defining value proposition

(Re)positioning requires defining a clear and compelling value proposition that sets the brand apart from its competitors. This involves identifying the unique selling points, competitive advantages, and key brand attributes that appeal to the target audience. The value proposition should communicate the brand’s core values, quality, aesthetics, sustainability, innovation, or any other distinctive factors that differentiate it from competitors.

Brand identity and image

(Re)positioning often involves reshaping or refining the brand identity and image to align with the desired positioning. This includes elements such as brand name, logo, visual identity, tone of voice, and overall brand personality. The brand identity should reflect the brand’s positioning strategy and resonate with the target audience, evoking the desired emotions and perceptions.

Marketing and communication strategies:

(Re)positioning necessitates developing new marketing and communication strategies to effectively convey the brand’s message and reach the target audience. This may involve revamping advertising campaigns, social media presence, content marketing, influencer collaborations, or other promotional activities. The messaging and communication channels should be tailored to the target audience’s preferences and behaviors, ensuring maximum impact and engagement.

Product and service offering

(Re)positioning might also involve adjusting or expanding the product or service offering to align with the new positioning strategy. This could involve introducing new product lines, collaborating with designers or influencers, or incorporating innovative features or sustainable practices. The product or service offering should deliver on the brand promise and meet the evolving needs and expectations of the target audience.

Market testing and evaluation

(Re)positioning requires monitoring and evaluating the impact of the changes implemented. Market testing and customer feedback play a crucial role in assessing the effectiveness of the (re)positioning strategy. This feedback helps identify areas for further improvement and refinement to ensure the brand’s positioning aligns with customer perceptions and preferences.

Case studies

Patagonia – Worn Wear & “Don’t Buy This Jacket” campaign

Patagonia has strategically repositioned itself from a performance outdoor brand to a benchmark for anti-consumption and circularity. The Worn Wear program and the famous “Don’t Buy This Jacket” campaign reframe value around repair, resale, and longevity rather than volume sales, accepting higher up-front prices while building loyalty around durability and environmental responsibility.
Project link – Worn Wear

Levi Strauss & Co. – Water<Less® jeans

Levi’s Water<Less® initiative repositions denim around resource efficiency by radically reducing water use in finishing processes. The program allows Levi’s to maintain its premium price positioning while differentiating on measurable environmental impact, integrating sustainability into core brand equity rather than treating it as a niche capsule.
Project link

adidas – End Plastic Waste & circular product lines

adidas has repositioned segments of its portfolio around the “End Plastic Waste” ambition, linking brand identity to circular materials and product take-back. Through circularity pilots and materials made for disassembly and recycling, the company reframes performance sportswear as a platform for systems change, justifying price points through durability, recyclability, and lower footprint.
Project link

H&M – Conscious Exclusive collections

H&M’s Conscious Exclusive collections use limited, design-led drops built from recycled and bio-based materials to reposition parts of the fast-fashion offer as premium, sustainable experimentation. By introducing higher-priced, material-innovative capsules and framing them as aspirational, the brand tests users’ willingness to pay for sustainability while seeding circular practices into the wider assortment.
Project link

MUD Jeans – Lease A Jeans circular denim model

MUD Jeans has repositioned jeans from one-off purchases to a service-based, circular product through its Lease A Jeans model. Users pay a monthly fee for organic or recycled-content denim and return worn pairs for repair, resale, or fibre-to-fibre recycling, aligning a higher perceived price with lifetime service, transparency, and material recovery.
Project link

References

Bandyopadhyay, S., & Ray, S. (2020). Sustainable fashion brand (juxta)positioning: An exploratory study. Journal of Global Marketing, 33(5), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1772935

Jiménez-Fernández, A., Verdú-Jover, A. J., & Gómez-Gras, J. M. (2023). Consumers’ awareness and attitudes in circular fashion. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7, 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100144

Kim, H., Jung, H. J., & Lee, Y. (2021). Consumers’ value and risk perceptions of circular fashion: Comparison between secondhand, upcycled, and recycled clothing. Sustainability, 13(3), 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031208

Mim, N. J., Firdaus, M., & Fakhri, M. (2022). The role of green brand positioning, green brand knowledge, and green brand image on green brand love and green purchase intention in the fashion industry. Sustainability, 14(19), 12461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912461

Ostermann, C. M., Nascimento, L. S., & Zen, A. C. (2021). Business model innovation for circular economy in fashion industry: A startups’ perspective. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2, 766614. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.766614